Best payday you get bad about online cash Ease And Convenience Of The Fast Cash Network Ease And Convenience Of The Fast Cash Network payday at any personal needs.

Creative Abrasion vs. Creative Collaboration

October 2nd, 2009 by admin Leave a reply »

Much has been written about collaborate teams within organizations to encourage creativity and much has been written about “Creative Abrasion” – creating a culture where ideas are challenged and new “intersections” are constantly made.   The two ideas are not mutually exclusive; they can co-exist within one organization, even though they may seem to be Opposites.   In fact, companies that are able to encourage both behaviors seem to be benefiting in the present economic environment.

Can a company culture support both?

Creative Friction

What do we mean by Creative Abrasion and what  causes this sort of friction within companies?

The terms was apparently created by Jerry Hirshberg, founder and president of Nissan Design International (NDI).  Xerox Parc leader John Seeley Brown refers to “creative abrasion” as: ideas that really rub against each other productively as opposed to destructively.”

A good example of creative abrasion was the birth of the Apple Macintosh computer.  It’s a well-known fact that Jobs took the original team out of the mainstream organization, created a sort of “skunk-works” within Apple, to complete the entire product (hardware, software) without having to deal with the hierarchy or politics of Apple corporate.  What is less often discussed is WHY this particular team was so successful.  Jobs – a stickler for detail – who often became involved in the smallest of details, created an environment of creative abrasion among team members.    The heart of creative abrasion was DIVERSITY, although it might not have seemed this way from afar.  The team members themselves, where hand-chosen by Jobs – and included a very wide array of artists, musicians and deep thinkers – even though you could label them all “software programmers”.

Diversity of talents, viewpoints, cultural differences, etc – this is what enables abrasive behavior, because the team with diversity will challenge itself.  Here is what Jobs himself had to say about this:

Creative Collaboration, too

At the same time, many  companies deep in creative culture stress the importance of collaboration among employees, across departments and even with customers.  Ed Catamult, CEO of Pixar, writes about the “peer driven” collaborative process for problem solving and creating movies: “Everyone is fully invested in helping everyone else turn out the best work…it’s all for one and one for all.”    Collaboration, on the surface, seems to make sense.  If the technology group at Pixar, can work well with the Production and the production team can work with the story-writers, and they all can work with the technologists to create incredible graphics, then it would seem collaboration is key to success.

Some good definitions and thoughts on forms of collaboration were discussed recently by Hagel, Seeley Brown and Davison on the Harvard Business School Publishing blog.

Collaboration seems to be the opposite of Abrasion – or is it?

Creative abrasion and collaboration can co-exist

The way these both can co-exist if leaders determine the best spot in the problem-solving or ideation process for each of them.  For example, the typical problem solving process goes like this:  choose/identify specific problem à generate (ideate) possible  solutions to the problem à choose from among best solutions à test out possible approaches, refine à choose best solution and create action plan for it.

When  creative abrasion occurs in the identification of problem, or identification of best solution, then politics, opinions and different ways of looking at the world may get in the way of making decisions.  If abrasion  occurs, however,  in the Ideation step, however, it allows for a confluence of opinions, options and ideas to emerge.  Creative abrasion can be very helpful because it unleashes the Power of Diversity.

When collaboration occurs during Problem Definition and refinement, and in Solution-gathering , the organization benefits – the company components are all working together in setting up for success.  But like-minded thinking and collaboration in the Ideation or brainstorming phases of a project may lead to “ho-hum thinking and lack of new ideas.  Pixar describes it like this – during meetings peers work together, but once the process of ideation is over, the ultimate decision as to which ideas to implement falls to the movie’s directors.

Ultimately a skilled creative leader is able to recognize the needs for both collaboration and  and organize the process, participants and stages of development in such as way as to benefit from both “Creative Abrasion” as well as “Peer Collaboration”.

Advertisement

5 comments

  1. Hoi Wan says:

    In regards to good artists copy, bad artists steal, is it the case that Google is a good copying artist is some circumstances.
    Take this article from forbes :- http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/21/google-baidu-internet-intelligent-technology-fannin.html
    It shows that google were behind Baidu in mobile search, social media. Whereas google may well have capitalised on this outside of China, maybe copying, maybe not but were certainly behind.

    The same article also talks about the failure of other western super internet companies such as Amazon (falling behind to dang dang) and ebay who lost out to taobao. Is it the case that colloboration culture needs to extend beyond the culture of the company and needs to understand the culture of the country in which it is trying to work in? Is it the case that working across international cultures in the context of a ‘corporate creative culture’ means a product is not innovative enough to cater for individual country cultures because it is too generic?

  2. I appreciate the work that you have put in, in this page. Really good, also I wish to quote a few lines from this article in my site, I will give a link back to this article. Again.. it is really a good work.
    Thanks
    Ajithkumar

  3. Jerome Wouters says:

    Dear Randy,

    Having taken your class last year, I must admit I had a hard time understanding why you stressed the importance of a creative environment so much, and especially that of having a creative workspace.

    The rational part of me was always kicking back this idea that “nice colors on the wall won’t make me more creative”. I was so right… and I was also so wrong!

    Now having joined an innovation team, we are facing an issue of relocating our offices. Funny how much the term “creative space” came into the discussion as a way to select buildings. But even funnier was how difficult it was for people to define it.

    Having thought this true in this situation, I believe it all comes down to an environment that encourages natural crative abrasion and creative collaboration. It’s not really about the colors, nor is it about having a beautiful lofty warehouse conversion.

    It’s rather about putting together a place that encourages people to talk together, exchange ideas, understand what neighbours are working on, putting loads of creative stimulus in place (magazines, random objects, walls for hanging out post-it notes, tools for rapid prototyping and experimentation, etc).

    As a wise man once said: “If you have one apple and I have one apple. If we both exchange our apples, we will still have one apple each. But if I have an idea and you have an idea. ANd if we both exchange our ideas, we will both end up with two ideas each.”

Leave a Reply